
NightWatch
For the Night of 1 October 2009
Afghanistan: In London, the top US commander told the International Institute for Strategic Studies that Afghanistan is still “winnable. “ But apparently will not be winnable indefinitely.
Military men are trained to think that way and use those words, but the military sense of winning implies defeat of an enemy. The enemy is evidently the Pashtuns people who live on and own the land they are fighting on and for.
The language of winning is not consistent with the commander’s initial assessment, leaked last week. Winning does not mean nation-building or restoring stability or power sharing, or protecting people. It means defeating an enemy.
It would be nice to learn what the heck these people really think in simple declarative sentences in active voice and with clarity and intelligence in the use of words. What, pray, is the meaning of “winning,” when up to half the population hate you or simply wish you would leave?
Iran-P5+1: Agence France-Presse reported today
Representatives of the Western powers, which have threatened new sanctions over
what they suspect is a bomb making program, expressed cautious optimism over
the
Clinton and Mottaki stayed away from the talks, leaving the negotiations in a
villa overlooking Lake Geneva to top envoys from the United States, Russia,
China, Britain, France and Germany, known as the P5-plus-1 partners, along with
Iran's senior nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili.
US Secretary of State Clinton said
So what happens after the IAEA inspectors find nothing at
the facility near
End of NightWatch
for 1 October.