
NightWatch
For the Night of 16
July 2008
Thailand-Cambodia: About
250 Thai and an unknown number of Cambodian soldiers are in the vicinity of the
Preah Vihear temple in northern Cambodia
because of a border dispute. The site is
an 11th century Hindu temple complex dedicated to Shiva that the
International Court of Justice awarded to Cambodia in a 1962 ruling. Although
the Court ruled that Preah Vihear belongs to Cambodia,
the border around the ruins remains in dispute and the most accessible entrance
is at the foot of a mountain in Thailand.
The Thai still claim 1.8 sq mi of the complex grounds
There is little danger of fighting. The soldiers from both
sides were reported to be sheltering in the same pagoda. Both sides apparently
are under orders to not use force, but the issue is getting news coverage and
merits it but not because of the troops. In Thailand
this is another issue that the Thai royalists and Bangkok political elite are using to unsettle
the populist government of Prime Minister Samak. This time the accusation is
that Samak’s government illegally tried to cede national territory and rights.
The UN approved the site for inclusion in its World Heritage
list on 8 July. Earlier, the Thai
government had signed a joint communiqué with Cambodia, but a Thai court ruled
that the joint communiqué, which former foreign minister Noppadon Pattama had
signed with Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An, was an international
agreement that could affect the national boundary. Under article 190 of the Constitution,
the government had to win parliamentary approval before the signing. In the UN list, the site is listed solely
under Cambodia.
Readers will recall in 2003 there were riots in Phnom Penh and the Thai embassy was burned over false
rumors that a famous Thai actress said the famous Cambodian Angkor Wat ruins
were Thai.
Guardianship of culture is a serious issue.
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has exploited this as a
personal and national triumph and has organized national celebrations, as part
of his election plans to have himself re-elected in the 27 July elections. Hun
Sen has been Prime Minister since 1998.
In Thailand,
the reaction has been quite different. Critics of Prime Minister Samak are
using the temple dispute against the government. The parliamentary opposition
is considering impeachment motions against the entire cabinet. The National
Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC) – the government oversight body created by
the generals before they restored democracy -- resolved to consider criminal
actions against the Samak cabinet for failing to seek parliamentary approval
for its joint communiqué concerning the Preah Vihear temple listing.
An example of the nationalist sentiment is a Thai political
expose published today that alleged shady deals between officials in the two
governments in which Thai support for the UN recognition of the site was
exchanged for Cambodia approval for Thai business interests linked to the
cabinet to develop oil concessions in the Gulf of Thailand, ostensibly in
cooperation with Chevron.
The significance of the court ruling against the government
and the yellow journalism is that these are the same issues that were used to
overthrow the Thaksin government: alienation of Thai national property and
corruption. Samak is considered to be a proxy for Thaksin. A military coup is not in the offing, as
there was against Thaksin, but Thai politics remain unsettled, despite the
restoration of democracy. This is a
study in democracy.
Pakistan-Afghanistan:
NATO and Afghan forces in Paktika Province,
which abuts Pakistan’s North
Waziristan Agency, retaliated against rockets fired from Pakistan. The
counter fire was coordinated with Pakistani authorities, according to a
spokesman. An International Security
Assistance Force (ISAF) base had "received multiple rocket attacks from
militants inside Pakistan,"
ISAF said in a statement. "The
troops identified a qalat (mound) as the point of origin of the attacks and
responded in self-defense with a combination of fires from attack helicopters
and artillery into Pakistan,"
according to The News.
The area of this engagement is not in Konar/Nurestan
Provinces north of Jalalabad, where the nine American soldiers were killed and
15 wounded on the 13th. This area is in southeast Afghanistan. The significance is that this is the area where
border region residents in both countries claimed yesterday that a buildup of
forces was taking place and expected an attack. Spokesmen in Afghanistan and Pakistan denied a buildup was
occurring, but today’s exchange of fire will not persuade the locals, who
started making their claims two days ago. That might signify an operational
security problem because the NATO/ISAF response looks like a well-prepared
ambush.
Pakistan: Security. The News reported that elements of
the Pakistan Army, the Frontier Constabulary (FC) and the Frontier Police,
supported by gunships and artillery, began an operation today to take back
control of two areas near Hangu where tribal fighters killed 17 Frontier
Constabulary constables and burned their outpost. Authorities also imposed a curfew on Hangu
town after the local Jirga of tribal elders failed to defuse the tension. Troops seized the “stronghold” of the local
fighters, but apparently without casualties to either side.
The BBC reported that Mohmand Agency in
the Federally Administered Tribal Areas has joined Bajaur has having permanent
Islamic courts created by the Pakistani Taliban. The Islamists divided Mohmand
into four judicial zones with two judges each and a permanent court building in
each plus one senior judge to handle appeals.
Pakistan’s
laws governing religious courts in the agencies are fairly permissive, but limit
their jurisdiction to religious matters, which are often difficult to discern.
The religious courts do not replace civil courts but they have much more local
impact because of the swiftness and harshness of their punishments. Like the
original Taliban in Afghanistan
in 1995 and 1996, the appeal of the Pakistani Taliban is that they bring order
and the government cannot maintain it.
Mohmand has not been mentioned in Pakistani or Indian media
as an area of militant attacks or as a base area for Pakistani Taliban, as have
the two Waziristan agencies. Bajaur also has
dropped below the limit of visibility. Nevertheless, the public establishment
of a permanent judiciary is an exercise of governmental authority.
Note to new analysts: Quiet areas are not necessarily stable or
secure, especially when there is fighting in adjacent regions. Opposition fighters require a quiet secure region
for rest and medical treatment no less than the forces of order. Mohmand and
Bajaur appear to be under Pakistani Taliban administration.
Politics. Pakistan Peoples Party leader Asif Ali
Zardari is said to have launched a move to convince his coalition partner Nawaz
Sharif to accompany him to the US
in a bid to convince the White House and the State Department to let them get
rid of President Pervez Musharraf so as to stabilize Pakistan.
Sources of The News claimed that Zardari was convinced that if both of
them visited Washington and met the top US
officials to discuss the fate of Musharraf, they might get quick and desired
results. The sources believe this would end the long political deadlock between
the two main ruling coalition partners over the issue of impeachment of
Musharraf and restoration of the deposed judges.
The invitation is said to have come because Nawaz Sharif has decided to increase
pressure on Asif Zardari, telling local reporters that the next round of talks
between the PPP and the Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N would be decisive.
For the first time since the two parties formed a coalition government in March
this year, Nawaz indicated that he might part company with Zardari if he failed
to execute both his public and secret commitments on restoration of the deposed
judges and impeachment of President Musharraf.
This is the second so-called breakthrough event that Zardari
has dangled in public. Supposedly he obtained approval for impeaching Musharraf
during his trip to Saudi
Arabia. Evidently not. The lack of movement
on basic issues is spawning these kinds of stories daily. The deadlock
continues, and the coalition continues to weaken.
Afghanistan-Iran:
Bloomberg published an article about
Iranian investment in Herat, the largest city in
western Afghanistan and the
nearest to Iran.
In 2006, Iran built a 200
mile highway that links Herat and Mashhad in
northeastern Iran.
Iran supplies electric power
to Herat, which
has a population of 350,000, and is in the process of building a railroad to
run along the highway. When completed it
will be the only major city serviced by a railroad. The only other rail link is a short spur from
Turkmenistan that terminates
at the border town of Torgundhi, just north of Herat.
Iran
paved half of Herat's
streets and 40 miles of highway leading north, built schools and health clinics
and partnered with Afghan companies in an industrial park, according to the
report. Observers report Herat is cleaner than Kabul, safer and more
prosperous. Iranian investment in this region is estimated at $500 million,
according to the Bloomberg report.
Herat was once a capital of Persia and has gravitated towards Iran more than to Kabul.
Its history of passive aggressive resistance to direction from Kabul has made it a lesser
claimant on national resources and should have impeded its return to normality.
However, Iranian investment has negated
that condition and been a source of relief for President Karzai, albeit at a
cost. It is an Iranian-influenced
enclave and one of the brighter spots in Afghanistan. Karzai has been very
cautious in public statements to avoid offending the Iranians.
Taliban have tended to avoid Herat
Province this year, attacking 32 times
in six months, but only five attacks were inside Herat City.
Instead they are focusing on Farah
Province, the next
province to the south, which has become a core province in the fighting.
Iran: For the record. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei, issued a personal threat against American President Bush on 16
July. "If George Bush orders a military strike against Iran, even if
he leaves it up to the next Administration, the Iranian nation will sue and
punish him even after his term in his office is over," Khamenei said.
This statement is reminiscent of North Korea’s style of public
diplomacy. A predictable tactic is to have an authoritative source make a
bellicose statement on the day the country agrees to hold negotiations with an
enemy. The tough talk apparently is
intended to assure domestic audiences that talking is not a sign of weakness
and to warn enemies against trying to take advantage of the situation because
the country is on guard. Even so, even the North Koreans seldom threaten a head
of state, including a South Korean president.
Saudi Arabia-Iraq: For the record. Saudi King Abdallah called for Iraq to "free itself from outside
interference" in an interview published July 16 by Italy's La
Repubblica newspaper. The ideal solution, Abdullah said, would be
"one country for all Iraqis, forgetting about ethnicity, or political and
religious affiliations."
Today the King is in Spain co-hosting with King Juan
Carlos an interfaith conference on tolerance. This is Abdallah’s third major
event of this kind.
According to the BBC, unidentified critics charge
that Saudi Arabia
is the last country on earth to preach tolerance to others and forgetting about
religious affiliations. In the Italian
press article, Abdallah did not define to whom he was referring as the agents
of “outside interference.”
Sudan:
A U.N.-African Union peacekeeper
was shot and killed in Darfur region today, a
week after militiamen killed seven peacekeepers, a U.N. spokeswoman said. The
peacekeeper for the joint U.N.-AU mission in Darfur (UNAMID) was killed while
on patrol in West Darfur, U.N. spokeswoman
told reporters. She had no other details about the incident.
The Sudanese parliament on Wednesday condemned the
indictment of the country’s president by an international prosecutor, arguing
that the move endangered vital peace negotiations, especially in the war torn Darfur region. The 450-seat house passed a resolution at
the end of a heated session in which scores of lawmakers railed against the
indictment of the Sudanese leader by the International Criminal Court on
genocide charges in Darfur and warned that it
would weaken President Omar al-Bashir and embolden rebels to abandon peace
negotiations.
Together the two events above signify that westerners are
now targets. The killing speaks for itself. The resolution describes acts of
foreign meddling against which Sudan
has a right of self-defense. Planning for an evacuation of non-combatants by
NATO governments is in order and UNAMID had best be on guard.
End of NightWatch
for 16 July.